In July 2007, 4 people broke into 63 year old Jose Luis Gozalez’s trailer.
Texas law allows one to defend life and property in their home with deadly force. (Castle Doctrine)
Mr. Gonzalez was not at home at the time, but did observe the break-in occur from a neighboring building. Having been a victim of similar crime in the past, he grabbed a 16-gauge shotgun went into his trailer to confront the intruders.

Jose Luis Gonzalez
He found the 4 boys, aged 11 to 15, had broken in to “rummage for snacks and soda.” Mr. Gonzalez ordered the 4 to their knees with their hands on their head.
These are the facts of the case.
The boys testified that they began begging for forgiveness after Gonzalez hit them with the barrel of his gun and kicked them repeatedly. Gonzalaez stated that “it was a situation in which I feared for my life.”
One of the boys, 13 year old Francisco Anguiano was then shot in the back at close range and died from his injuries. The medical examiner testified that he had two mashed Twinkies and some cookies in his pockets.
Gonzalez stated that Anguiano was “lunging at him” when he fired the gun and that ”it was a case where it was my life or theirs…”
Jesus Soto Jr, now 16, testified that Gonzalez then ordered them at gunpoint to take Anguiano’s body outside.
After the police pressed charges against Gonzalez, a large population in Laredo became very vocal in opposition stating “the kid got what he deserved” and called for the “stop [of] the unfair prosecution.”
Just this past week, the jury of 8 men and 4 women took 3 hours to find Mr. Gonzalez not guilty of murder.
(AP Story)
First things first, I am in no way condemning the 4 boys for breaking into a home for any reason. This was wrong and illegal, but I did want to bring the case up because of the ultimate outcome.
I did some homework for you… here is the link to the
Texas Law regarding the use of deadly force.
Now, I do believe that there should be protection under law for people to defend themselves against threats to their life and property… and that it may mean the use of deadly force to protect life.
However, from the information I’ve heard (knowing that I was not privy to the hearing), and the impression I get, I’m not so sure this situation met all the elements of the law.
Was Gonzalez in legitimate fear for his life if he was already someplace safe but thought it was okay to go into is trailer after the boys?
Moreover, Texas law states that the homeowner must not “provoke” the criminal. If Gonzalez was not in his home when he observed the 4 boys entering… did he provoke the boys when he went in after them? Would the situation have arisen had it not been for Gonzalez’s direct action? (And this doesn’t even address the testimony that Gonzalez was kicking and hitting them with the barrel of the gun while they were kneeling.)